Haig Khatchadourian
Common Names and "Family
Resemblances"
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Mar., 1958)
[SK's comments]
Maurice Mandelbaum:
"Haig Khatchadourian
has shown that Wittgenstein is less explicit than he should have been with respect to the levels of determinateness at which these resemblances are significant for our use of common names."
This paper makes for utterly thankless reading. I think it's also completely wrong about the "determinateness" issue. Unfortunately, several art-philosophers of the day refer to it, including in the above case, where it serves as a means of reconstituting what Wittgenstein sought to dissolve. Hence we charge ahead at full-throttle.
[341]
COMMON NAMES AND "FAMILY RESEMBLANCES"
I
...
we propose to give, first,
a brief analysis of Wittgenstein's notion
...
Next we shall try to show
that
whether or not "family resemblances" constitute a general feature of ordinary language so far as common names are concerned,
there are at least some common names
such that the things named by them
do have
one or more features in common,
though this feature or these features are not
a determinate or relatively determinate
quality or characteristic.
Whatsoever could be a
feature
without also being
a determinate
quality or characteristic
?
Whatsoever
could this "determinacy"
be
relative
to?
