The imitation of another musician's personal style is
often considered to be an act of reverence. If the
imitation is too close, it may cross over into the
realm of plagiarism. But more often than either of
these, it is an act of vanity.
When John Q.
Composer writes a new work that is significantly
indebted to a previous one yet is of lesser quality,
the most important thing about the new work is that he
is the one who created it. It fills no particular void
or need, for the work he has imitated does so already,
and in fact does so more effectively.
Even
within the confines of an antiquated musical style,
there is always room for expansion in between
extant masterpieces. However, there is no room for
stacking new works on top of them.
04 March 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment