28 October 2006
The New Avant-Garde
I was at a rehearsal a few weeks ago and one of the
musicians said something really deep: "Harmony is the
new avant-garde." I've heard people say similar
things, but this really seemed to put everything in
perspective. Of all the elements music has
traditionally been divided into, harmony is indeed the
most lacking on commercial radio right now. This
helped me make a connection to another issue I'd been
thinking about recently, which is that for some time
now, there has been a wing of "contemporary" music
that maintains that the symphony and concerto are dead
forms. Others may go as far as to say this about the
symphony orchestra in general, and yes, you'll even
hear it uttered occasionally that instruments played
by real people are obsolete. For the first time ever,
I started to wonder a couple of weeks ago if I really
had anything meaningful to contribute as an orchestral
composer, or perhaps if it was even still possible to have
anything meaningful to contribute as an orchestral
composer. I still think the answer is yes, at least to
the latter if not the former. But with all the recent
talk of "saving" classical music, I started to wonder
what position it would put us in if classical music
indeed "died." The answer is clear: eventually, the
orchestra would be new again. People would forget
about it, or be born and raised without knowing it
ever existed. Then suddenly, a revival would be upon
us. The craze would sweep the country. There would be
professional and community groups popping up left and
right to capitalize on the opportunity. Well...I'm not
betting on this happening, but I think that given the
present conditions, there is nowhere to go but up:
from now on, the more marginalized the orchestra gets,
the cooler it gets. Perhaps the symphony is the new
avant-garde.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment